Friday, April 08, 2005


The sovereignty as license ethic is clear in the Orwellian Constitution Restoration Act.

The so-called Constitution Restoration Act is described here.
The violations of Articles 1 and 6 are obvious.

More, Constitution Restoration Act:

QUOTE:The House version is H.R. 3799 and the Senate version is S. 2082. The bill limits the U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts to hear cases involving “expressions of religious faith by elected or appointed officials.”
Although the claim by its sponsors appears to be that the intention is to prevent the courts from hearing cases involving the Ten Commandments or a Nativity Scene in a public setting from being reviewed, the law is drawn broadly and expressly includes the acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law by an official in his capacity of executing his office. John Giles, Alabama President of Christian Coalition said, "The greatest unbridled abuse by the
federal judiciary for over forty years has been in the area of redefining the acknowledgement of God as the sovereign source of law...We define this as judicial activism, making law from the bench. These unconstitutional rulings have gone unchecked by other branches of government."END QUOTE.

I do not acknowledge God as the sovereign source of anything.
To do so as an individual would be arrogant.
To do so on behalf of a nation is despotic.
Arrest and impeach these reprobates!

QUOTE:The following proposed law will be added to Sec. 1260 of Title 28, Chapter 81 of the U.S. Code:
“Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review, by appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, any matter to the extent that relief is sought against an element of Federal, State, or local government, or against an officer of Federal, State, or local government (whether or not acting in official personal capacity), by reason of that element’s or officer’s acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law,
liberty, or government.”END QUOTE.

God is the source of law, liberty and government? Not in a secular western society. This sounds like oriental despotism in the rooting stage.

QUOTE:In addition the proposed bill punishes sitting judges by requiring impeachment and removal, if they rely on decisions from another state or jurisdiction, such as another state’s constitution, law, administrative rule or judicial decision. The proposed Section 201,
“Interpretation of the Constitution” reads: “In interpreting and applying the Constitution of the United States, a court of the United States may not rely upon any constitution, law, administrative rule, Executive order, directive, policy, judicial decision, or any other action of any foreign state or international organization or agency, other than the constitutional law and English common law.”END QUOTE.

Again, we see the influence of the sovereignty as license ethic. Judges are not free to consult multiple sources of law, they are not free to think for themselves. The law restores nothing and destroys the Constitution. Next the citizens will be told they must bow with their head touching the ground before they may speak to Caesar via keyboard and purple screen!

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?